132,957
edits
Changes
Newest Popular Science Reviews (view source)
Revision as of 07:56, 24 November 2014
, 07:56, 24 November 2014no edit summary
[[Category:New Reviews|Popular Science]] __NOTOC__ <!-- Remove -->
{{newreview
|author=New Scientist
|title=Question Everything: 132 science questions - and their unexpected answers
|rating=4.5
|genre=Popular Science
|summary=For years now the ''New Scientist'' magazine has had a column whereby people submit questions they want the answer to, and it's up to correspondents from all walks of life to submit the answer and explain the solution. It's nothing new – the Guardian had it for years, then the Daily Mail probably had Britain's most popular variant, what with it being daily, but none were purely science-based such as that under perusal. It's a simple format for a book – not only does it create a fun kick-back at the close of an at-times hard-going science read, it generates a book full of fun and intriguing Q&As almost every year. Chances are that, by relying on the interests of their audience, the editors have allowed themselves to publish books that will appeal to many people who have never looked at their weekly edition – certainly they have been incredibly popular, and massively boosted the magazine's public recognition. And this volume will not be any different.
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1781251649</amazonuk>
}}
{{newreview
|title=Encyclopedia Paranoiaca
|summary=If I told you that doctors had been using human beings in the most horrible of medical experiments, that they had done things like tie toddlers to beds to insert live pathogens into their eyes, injected children with radiation, sterilised those thought to be subhuman and even castrated a child just to get a supply of tissue for a lab experiment, you might very reasonably assume I am talking abut Nazi Germany. I am not.
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0230341713</amazonuk>
}}