Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
The author concludes with a short chapter on the potential for peace at the end of 1916, the point at which some British ministers doubted in clear-cut victory and felt that the rate of casualties was rising beyond acceptable levels. But hardliners, among them Lloyd George, who reminded doubters that it had taken twenty years for England to defeat Napoleon, ensured that the war would still be waged until the job was done. He has accomplished a thorough job in telling the story by building the picture up from several different theatres of war and combining them into a unified whole. It adds a new dimension to the prodigious number of books on the subject that have come our way since the centenary of 1914 approached, and in taking a rather different approach to that adopted by authors who have chosen to portray the story of the full four years, makes a valuable addition to their number.
For more on specific aspects of the war, may be also recommend [[Gallipoli, by Peter Hart]]; for the prelude as to how it came about, [[The War that Ended Peace: How Europe abandoned peace for the First World War by Margaret MacMillan]]; and for eyewitness accounts of those involved in the fighting, [[The Beauty and the Sorrow: An intimate history of the First World War by Peter Englund]].
{{toptentext|list=Top Ten History Books 2015}}