The Interview: Bookbag Talks To Simon Pont

From TheBookbag
Revision as of 13:42, 4 July 2013 by Sue (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{infoboxinterviews |title=The Interview: Bookbag Talks To Simon Pont |reviewer=Sue Magee |summary=Before she started Remember to Breathe...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The Interview: Bookbag Talks To Simon Pont

Bookinterviews.jpg

Summary: Before she started Remember to Breathe Sue wondered if it was going to be the sort of book she would enjoy, but she loved it and had quite a few questions for author Simon Pont when he popped in to see us.
Date: 4 July 2013
Interviewer: Sue Magee
Reviewed by Sue Magee

Share on: Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Stumbleupon Follow us on Twitter



Before she started Remember to Breathe Sue wondered if it was going to be the sort of book she would enjoy, but she loved it and had quite a few questions for author Simon Pont when he popped in to see us.

  • Bookbag: When you close your eyes and imagine your readers, who do you see?

Simon Pont: It’s a lovely question, though the shape and form of who isn’t exact to me. I wrote ‘Remember to Breathe’ for people who love fiction, who enjoy characters and love the escape and fun they can give; whether it’s being in the moment when you’re lying on a beach, bending the pages of a paperback with that smell of warm skin and sun cream in your nose, or whether it’s being taken out of the moment when you’re riding the District Line into work on a grizzly day. I know that all might sound a bit lyrical, but what I’m trying to say, is that when I close my eyes, the images are less of who and more of where, of where people are reading. That’s what I see.

  • BB: I’ve got to ask: how much of your hero, Samuel Grant, is autobiographical? And if so, do you have any regrets?

SP: You’re not the first to ask. Well, they do say you should write about what you know... and by extension, who you know. There’s a lot of people I’ve met and know who provided starting points for the characters. And I of course include myself in that line-up. But then, it was just a case of going to town, exaggerating like hell, and letting all of the characters come to life and show me their stories.

And while, sure, there’s some of me and a whole lot of other folk I know in Samuel Grant... I think there’s a little bit of Samuel Grant in all of us. My hope was to try and create an archetypal male character, someone that reflects his time, an anti-heroic type who’s trying to be heroic. And I think Sam’s originality stems from his self-awareness, and his ability to emotionally articulate, and be so honest. Male characters are so often stereotypes. Think: strong, silent, matinee-idol throwbacks. By contrast, I think Sam holds his own exploits in ironic disdain... yet he still wants to come out a hero and a winner and a good guy. It’s in creating these dynamic tensions and contradictions that hopefully makes Sam feel very real to readers – and then also leaves them a little conflicted as to how they should feel about him.

And no, no regrets. At least, not yet.

  • BB: Is Adland really like that?

SP: Adland is no different to any other industry badlands, in that there are lunatics and rednecks with shotguns, just like every industry, and maybe some hungry tigers too. But adland is more good than bad and arguably closer to a Narnia, a place of friendly lions where new frontiers are forming all the time.

I love advertising, when it’s done right, where it’s a case of some very creative, intelligent people being intelligent and creative and achieving brilliant things.

On the flipside, I think “workplace nonsense” is over-ripe for full-tilt parody and derision. In RTB, the depiction is a thin slice of the dark side, skewed, Sisyphean – and it is a side that also rings true for people.

  • BB: I’ve always associated your name with non-fiction writing. What persuaded you to move into fiction?

SP: Funnily enough, it’s actually the other way around. Writing non-fiction was actually a bit of a later-dawning epiphany, that came after I’d written ‘Remember to Breathe’. The novel predates the non-fiction titles, and I kind of persuaded myself to write a book on brands and media.

As people would imagine, writing fiction and non-fiction are very different endeavours. Creatively, they come from a different place. For me, writing fiction takes up a lot more head and heart space, where it’s not so easy to switch off - but also, where you don’t necessarily want to switch off.

Though there are cross-overs too, in that I look to write non-fiction with a strong authorial voice and writing style, and where the ideas and themes hang off cultural pegs that people are hopefully familiar with. I think the challenge with non-fiction is to give it pace, to frame the subject matter in a way that’s very accessible and page-turning.

  • BB: Quite a few people have asked if we’re going to hear more about Sam Grant. Are you planning a sequel?

SP: When I finished Remember to Breathe, I actually, very genuinely missed the characters. The novel is character-driven, and one of the greatest pleasures for me, and a kind of proof that it works, is that people who read it typically ask, “What happened next? What happened to Sam, to Tam, to Jamie?” When I completed the novel, I remember wondering the same thing.

There is an appetite for a sequel. It would be fascinating to contemporise what is a nostalgically-set group of people; to turn pre-Facebook Twenty-somethings into present-day Forty-somethings.

Some have even suggested a prequel, maybe an early-90s university years story. Whether a sequel or prequel, the creative challenge, I think, would be achieve the right balance of character and narrative. Because we now know the characters, their core personalities, and so that initial novelty is gone. So there would have to be more external story, throw more slings and arrows at Sam. And the trick would be to do it in a way that was still original, without turning proceedings into a rom-com farce or faux “on-the-run” thriller. Pitfalls aside, working it all out would be huge fun.

  • BB: I was very nearly put off reading the book by the comparison to Bridget Jones. How do you feel about it?

SP: In all honesty, it kinda worries me. The Bridget Jones comparison is nothing more than a reference point that’s immediate for people – a promotional device, to cite a familiar literary character where some parallels could be drawn. The danger, of course, is that then some may suspect Sam is some kind of rip-off, or was somehow “inspired by”. Maybe if Bridget Jones and Patrick Bateman had a love child, you’d net out at somewhere near Samuel Grant. But again, I’m reaching.

The fact is, Samuel Grant isn’t born from other literary places. He doesn’t come out of fiction. He comes from life, a creation I wanted to capture in fiction.

  • BB: Where and how do you write? With or without music?

SP: I can write pretty much anywhere. Which is more out of necessity than anything. I have three young children, so time and time to write isn’t in abundant supply. But my wife is very supportive and helps me carve out space. And then, it’s also about being active in the down-time. I’ll write “emails” to myself on my Blackberry. Smartphones with touchscreens don’t work for me. I like real, physical, very analogue buttons. I can rattle out paragraphs on my Blackberry that I then email to myself, where I’ll later throw it into a Word document and see where it takes me.

But ideally, my lap top, a little peace and quiet and a second coffee-of-the-day at my side, and I’m a very happy guy.

Though curiously, I find music distracting.

  • BB: What are you reading at the moment? What’s your desert island book?

SP: At the moment: William Boyd’s ‘Waiting for Sunrise’. I’m really enjoying it – I love the historical 1913/14/15 context - though I’d have loved him to reconsider the title. Personally, ‘Waiting for Sunrise’ is generically forgettable. But then, his previous, ‘Ordinary Thunderstorms’, was a great title but I found it a less satisfying read.

And if I was packing for a desert island, I might just have to find room for two; simply pack fewer shorts. As some sort of record, how about ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and ‘1984’, a kind of companion-set and commentary on human nature and our potential for good and otherwise. Both novels example fiction at its most profound and fundamental. I first read both in my teens, and they were massively influential and informing, part of my reading rites of passage.

Of course, if my other suitcase washed up on shore, the one with all the books packed in it, then all sorts of guys would spill out onto the sand: Norman Mailer, Stephen King, Carl Hiaasen, Luke Rhinehart, Ian Fleming, Stephen Fry, Philip Pullman, Iain Banks.

  • BB: We'll see what we can manage with that second suitcase, Simon.

You’ve got one wish - what’s it to be?

SP: Health and happiness; what else is there?

  • BB: What's next for Simon Pont?

SP: Summer with the children. Sunshine. Family time. New schools and back-to-work in the Autumn. And, with hope, a clear intention on the next writing project. At present I’m juggling and torn (makes coordination hard) on which way to go. Non-fiction or developing a new novel? But I don’t mind admitting, it’s a nice problem to have.

  • BB: And lots there for us to look forward to. Thanks for chatting to us, Simon.

You can read more about Simon Pont here.

Bookfeatures.jpg Check out Bookbag's exciting features section, with interviews, top tens and editorials.

Comments

Like to comment on this feature?

Just send us an email and we'll put the best up on the site.