132,948
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{infoboxinfobox1
|title=Being
|author=Kevin Brooks
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|pages=336
|publisher=Puffin Books
|date=March 2007
|isbn=978-0141381442
|website=http://www.myspace.com/kevinbrooksauthor
|cover=0141381442
|aznuk=0141381442
|aznus=0439899737
}}
A routine endoscopy looking for stomach ulcers ends sixteen-year-old Robert Smith's conception of himself as a teenage boy like any other. Conscious but still anaesthetised, he can hear the commotion surrounding an operation gone wrong. For the surgeons haven't found an ulcer. Instead, they have found a network of mysterious and advanced technological implants. Terrified, they have called in a shadowy government agency and a sinister agent called Ryan appears to be directing the doctors. And then all hell breaks loose. On the run from the authorities, Robert hooks up with Eddi Ray, the ex-girlfriend of an old friend's brother. Eddi specialises in producing false identities and together they try to find out what has happened to Robert.
I don't think Kevin Brooks is capable of writing a poor paragraph, let alone a poor book. [[Lucas]] featured a quasi-Christ figure and stayed with me for months after I read it. My son has read it at least a dozen times. [[''Martyn Pig]] '' is one of the saddest yet funniest books I've ever read. It has quite a sad ending, yet left me feeling full of hope. That's quite an achievement. I was a little worried about ''Being'', as a quick flick through the press release left me feeling I was in for a Blade Runner reprise and not the Brooks singularity I've come to admire. I really shouldn't be such a Doubting Thomas.
''Being'' isn't quite a reprise of Bladerunner, although it isn't so very far away. It is a sci-fi thriller with a romantic sub-plot. But it is stamped all over with that singular voice. The world of teen literature is - thankfully - full of wonderful writers. But there are few who are so clearly driven to express themselves - warts and all - through art and who choose young people as their audience. David Almond is one, Melvyn Burgess is another. And Kevin Brooks is yet another. There is a very symbiotic relationship between Brooks and his readers. It's very clear that each are serving needs in the other. And it makes for some very special books.
{{amazontext|amazon=0141381442}}
{{amazonUStext|amazon=0439899737}}
{{commenthead}}
{{comment
|name=Magda
|verb=said
|comment= OK, I'll read some of his.
In my so called time and place we didn't have any teenage fiction like that, as far as I remember anyway. Or maybe, some. But mostly it was tainted by a moralising streak.
}}
{{comment
|name=Jill
|verb=replied
|comment= Read Lucas first then, as it's my favourite. I think "young adult" writing is a relatively new phenomenon, cos I only really remember thinking Catcher In The Rye was ok if you were a boy but crap if you were a girl and then moving straight on to Jack Kerouac and thinking pretty much the same thing. I think I went from decent children's books via trashy adult books straight to cult fiction. Some of this teen market, obviously, is tosh, and it's increasingly being invaded by genre pieces corresponding to adult genre fiction, but some of it, like the stuff by this guy, is truly excellent.
}}
{{comment
|name=Magda
|verb=said
|comment= I have just read Lucas, and it was good, I wouldn't have given it 5 stars though. The story is great in its inevitability, and the Lucas figure is outstanding, the animal element in particular was a master's touch.
But there was something with the narrator's narration that just left me cold: perhaps her constant meta-analysis and listings of the emotions (as in: "there was so many emotions xxx, yy, zzz" and then again "all these emotions aaa, bb, ccc").
Oh, and I could never understand the furore over Catcher in the Rye, I always thought his short stories were much better.
}}
{{comment
|name=Jill
|verb=replied
|comment= Ha. You're a navel-gazer and you moan about navel-gazing? Funny lady!
}}
{{comment
|name=Kerry
|verb=said
|comment= I can't believe from the review, Jill, that this is a teenager\'s book...is it like adults who read Harry Potter? Does it translate to adult fiction?
}}
{{comment
|name=Jill
|verb=replied
|comment= Um... no. It's teen fiction. Meant for teenagers. Where Harry Potter is light genre fiction meant for pre and early teens and is sometimes enjoyed by adults, Being is a complicated contemporary novel aimed at older teens and young adults and is intended to inspire existential debate. They're like chalk and cheese, Kerry, sorry!
}}
{{comment
|name=Sazzy1234
|verb=said
|comment= I loved this book. My friend gave me a copy of Lucas to read and i loved that, so when i saw this on the selves and read the back i was like...i want it!
I read it in a day, i couldn't put it down.
This is my favourite book ever!
}}
[[Category:Thrillers]]