132,957
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{infobox infobox1
|title=Pitch Black
|author=Alex Gray
|date=April 2008
|isbn=978-1847440686
|amazonukcover=0751538744|aznuk=0751538744|aznus=<amazonuk>0751538744</amazonuk>
}}
Any doubt is dispelled with the shooting dead of the second of Kelvin's summer signings, Jason White. There is definitely a serial killer on the loose. As the investigation plods on, the Kelvin Chairman, Patrick (Big Pat) Kennedy seems to be next on the killer's hit list. The climax of the novel then becomes a race against time – can Lorimer and his team apprehend the killer before he carries out his evil plan?
Alex Gray employs a number of interesting techniques in the telling of her story. Newspaper cuttings, emails, chat room exchanges, the banter of football commentaries. Sometimes these devises devices come off. Sometimes, though, they feel contrived and repetitive, annoyingly summarising or explaining what the reader has already surmised. Gray also has an irritating habit of getting her characters to ask themselves endless questions. ''Could she really have killed her husband?'' Lorimer asks himself. Good writers – writers like Ian Rankin, for instance – usually leave the reader to ask such questions themselves. On other occasions, Gray uses the question as a device for trying to increase tension: ''She was safe, but for how much longer?'' It is a lazy way of trying to make her story more gripping. When she has Lorimer ask himself, ''What was likely to happen to Kelvin after this season? Could they possibly survive after the events of these past weeks?'' I'm afraid I asked myself, ''Who cares?''
I may be being harsh, but Gray and her publishers have brought that on themselves by comparing Gray with the great Ian Rankin. In this novel, Gray even has a ghostly spirit of a past player called Rankin lurking in the club boot room (and playing a major part in the tale that I won't reveal). The problem is, Gray is nowhere near Rankin's league (if you'll excuse the pun). Too often, Gray distances the reader from the action by filtering it through the eyes of her characters. For example, she might say something like, ''Lorimer saw that the man had a gun''. Rankin would say, ''The man had a gun''. It's a small point, but such things make the action more immediate. These are the errors of a novice novelist, and, as Gray made clear in a recent article in ''shotsmag'', she is still is only a novice. On the plus side, the whodunit element of the novel works well. There is a full cast of suspects and the novel is littered with clues, motives and red herrings. I didn't know until the denouement who the killer was, so full marks to Gray for that.
Further reading: There are so many good cop series out there already – if what you want is Scottish noir then why not go straight for anything by [[Ian Rankin's Inspector John Rebus novels in chronological order|Ian Rankin]]?
[[Alex Gray's DCI Lorimer novels in Chronological Order]]
{{amazontext|amazon=0751538744}}