Difference between revisions of "The Undomestic Goddess by Sophie Kinsella"
m (1 revision) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{infobox1 |
|title=The Undomestic Goddess | |title=The Undomestic Goddess | ||
|sort=Undomestic Goddess | |sort=Undomestic Goddess | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|reviewer=Sue Magee | |reviewer=Sue Magee | ||
|genre=Women's Fiction | |genre=Women's Fiction | ||
| − | |summary=A top-flight lawyer becomes a housekeeper despite having no domestic skills. It's formulaic | + | |summary=A top-flight lawyer becomes a housekeeper despite having no domestic skills. It's formulaic chick lit, but if you want an easy, light-hearted read then you could do worse than to borrow it from the library. |
|rating=3 | |rating=3 | ||
|buy=No | |buy=No | ||
|borrow=Maybe | |borrow=Maybe | ||
| − | |||
|pages=416 | |pages=416 | ||
|publisher=Black Swan | |publisher=Black Swan | ||
| − | |date=January | + | |date=January 2006 |
|isbn=0552772747 | |isbn=0552772747 | ||
| − | | | + | |cover=0552772747 |
| − | | | + | |aznuk=0552772747 |
| + | |aznus=0552772747 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Samantha Sweeting is a lawyer and all her adult life she's had just one ambition. She is desperate to become a partner of the prestigious law firm for whom she works. Just as she's about to achieve this she apparently makes a massive error and runs away from it all. She gets on a train - the first train to anywhere - and finds herself stranded in a Cotswold village. There's a beautiful house nearby and she knocks on the door hoping for a glass of water, but the owner thinks that she's come for an interview for the post of housekeeper. Desperate for somewhere to stay she accepts the job despite the fact that she can't cook, launder or do anything else remotely domesticated. It's only the charms of the gardener that keep her in the job. | Samantha Sweeting is a lawyer and all her adult life she's had just one ambition. She is desperate to become a partner of the prestigious law firm for whom she works. Just as she's about to achieve this she apparently makes a massive error and runs away from it all. She gets on a train - the first train to anywhere - and finds herself stranded in a Cotswold village. There's a beautiful house nearby and she knocks on the door hoping for a glass of water, but the owner thinks that she's come for an interview for the post of housekeeper. Desperate for somewhere to stay she accepts the job despite the fact that she can't cook, launder or do anything else remotely domesticated. It's only the charms of the gardener that keep her in the job. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Having said all that, the second half of the book is better than the first. I found the Samantha who realised that she could relax and enjoy herself more believable than the lawyer. I did sense some spark between Samantha and Nathaniel and the portrayal of Samantha's reluctance and indecision about going back to her old life was well done. You could see all of the ending coming a mile away, but it all works out the way that you want it to, so that's no hardship. | Having said all that, the second half of the book is better than the first. I found the Samantha who realised that she could relax and enjoy herself more believable than the lawyer. I did sense some spark between Samantha and Nathaniel and the portrayal of Samantha's reluctance and indecision about going back to her old life was well done. You could see all of the ending coming a mile away, but it all works out the way that you want it to, so that's no hardship. | ||
| − | + | The characterisation is, well, extreme. No one ever does anything by halves and sometimes they undergo a complete personality change. An avuncular and friendly man turns out to be a villain. The nouveau-riche employers of the housekeeper turn out to have hearts of gold and feather brains. The gardener has hidden depths and an obliging mother. The lawyers get lawyers a bad name. | |
| − | What redeems this book is the writing style. It's very easy to read. Kinsella has a good ear for dialogue and moves the story along at a steady pace. If you're looking for an undemanding summer holiday read then you could do a lot worse - Barbara Taylor Bradford's [[Emma's Secret]] or indeed any of her later work, springs to mind, but you could do better too. For something with a little more meat and style you could try Julian Fellowes' [[Snobs]], Anthony Capella's [[The Food of Love]] or Maggie O'Farrell's [[After You'd Gone]]. | + | What redeems this book is the writing style. It's very easy to read. Kinsella has a good ear for dialogue and moves the story along at a steady pace. If you're looking for an undemanding summer holiday read then you could do a lot worse - Barbara Taylor Bradford's [[Emma's Secret]] or indeed any of her later work, springs to mind, but you could do better too. For something with a little more meat and style you could try Julian Fellowes' [[Snobs]], Anthony Capella's [[The Food of Love]] or Maggie O'Farrell's [[After You'd Gone]]. We also have a review of [[Finding Audrey by Sophie Kinsella|Finding Audrey by Sophie Kinsella]]. |
| − | {{amazontext|amazon=0552772747}} | + | {{amazontext|amazon=0552772747}} |
| + | {{amazonUStext|amazon=0552772747}} | ||
{{commenthead}} | {{commenthead}} | ||
| Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
|name=Wendy | |name=Wendy | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=I am off on hols on 13th June so may get this to read. It's also nice to have something easy going to read in between heavier books - like Stephen King. |
| − | I am off on hols on 13th June so may get this to read. It's also nice to have something easy going to read in between heavier books - like Stephen King. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
|name=dizilizi | |name=dizilizi | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=To start off with I thought the story was a tad on the silly side. I mean a lawyer getting mistaken for a cleaner then suddenly deciding it was the ideal job for her is rather unlikely. I have read some of Sophie's other books and they were much better, this one wasn't quite up to scratch I'm afraid. |
| − | To start off with I thought the story was a tad on the silly side. I mean a lawyer getting mistaken for a cleaner then suddenly deciding it was the ideal job for her is rather unlikely. I have read some of Sophie's other books and they were much better, this one wasn't quite up to scratch I'm afraid. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
|name=lhine | |name=lhine | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=Agreed - this is very undemanding and probably what you'd take on your holidays to read by the pool. Some parts are just beyond belief knocking on strangers doors ,a highly successfull barrister legging it after a mistake and then pretending to be a housekeeper/chef (and getting away with it)etc. etc. But having said that it is chick-lit and should be taken, and enjoyed) as such! |
| − | Agreed - this is very undemanding and probably what you'd take on your holidays to read by the pool. Some parts are just beyond belief knocking on strangers doors ,a highly successfull barrister legging it after a mistake and then pretending to be a housekeeper/chef (and getting away with it)etc. etc. But having said that it is chick-lit and should be taken, and enjoyed) as such! | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
|name=Sophie.emma | |name=Sophie.emma | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=It is an entertaining easy read and a different theme to Sophie Kinsella's usual shopaholic books. |
| − | It is an entertaining easy read and a different theme to Sophie Kinsella's usual shopaholic books. | ||
I didn't have any trouble staying interested and reading it from start to finish whilst on holiday, although I do agree that the ending became predictable near the end. | I didn't have any trouble staying interested and reading it from start to finish whilst on holiday, although I do agree that the ending became predictable near the end. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 67: | Line 64: | ||
|name=Amanda Borley | |name=Amanda Borley | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=I enjoyed this book which is a light-hearted read. I am a fan of Sophie Kinsella's previous shopaholic series and was worried that she wouldn't be able to match the readability in this, however I was not disappointed. |
| − | I enjoyed this book which is a light-hearted read. I am a fan of Sophie Kinsella's previous shopaholic series and was worried that she wouldn't be able to match the readability in this, however I was not disappointed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
|name=Sue | |name=Sue | ||
|verb=replied | |verb=replied | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=I enjoyed the Shopaholic series, Amanda - I Just didn't feel that this was up to the same standard. |
| − | I enjoyed the Shopaholic series, Amanda - I Just didn't feel that this was up to the same standard. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{comment | {{comment | ||
|name=Wendy | |name=Wendy | ||
|verb=said | |verb=said | ||
| − | |comment= | + | |comment=I have just read ''Can You Keep a Secret'' and this was to be my next read of Kinsella. I will give it a go as I need "no brainers" every now and then to balance out the horror of King and Herbert!}} |
| − | I have just read ''Can You Keep a Secret'' and this was to be my next read of Kinsella. I will give it a go as I need "no brainers" every now and then to balance out the horror of King and Herbert!}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:22, 25 August 2020
| The Undomestic Goddess by Sophie Kinsella | |
|
| |
| Category: Women's Fiction | |
| |
Reviewer: Sue Magee
 | |
| Summary: A top-flight lawyer becomes a housekeeper despite having no domestic skills. It's formulaic chick lit, but if you want an easy, light-hearted read then you could do worse than to borrow it from the library. | |
| Buy? No | Borrow? Maybe |
| Pages: 416 | Date: January 2006 |
| Publisher: Black Swan | |
| ISBN: 0552772747 | |
|
Share on: | |
|
| |
Samantha Sweeting is a lawyer and all her adult life she's had just one ambition. She is desperate to become a partner of the prestigious law firm for whom she works. Just as she's about to achieve this she apparently makes a massive error and runs away from it all. She gets on a train - the first train to anywhere - and finds herself stranded in a Cotswold village. There's a beautiful house nearby and she knocks on the door hoping for a glass of water, but the owner thinks that she's come for an interview for the post of housekeeper. Desperate for somewhere to stay she accepts the job despite the fact that she can't cook, launder or do anything else remotely domesticated. It's only the charms of the gardener that keep her in the job.
There was a point when I wondered if I would be able to finish this book. It was only the fact that it was a borrowed book that stopped me ripping it up and throwing it in the bin. I found the character of Samantha Sweeting infuriating and totally unbelievable. At the beginning of the book we see her as a competent, if over-worked, lawyer, very much in control of what's she's doing. She's within moments of achieving a partnership when an error comes to light. We then have a complete change of personality. Instead of staying to sort the matter out and acting with integrity she does a runner. She does what an immature schoolgirl would have done. If she was so incapable of handling the pressure she wouldn't have been successful in her job. A good lawyer is calm in that sort of emergency.
If I thought the book was poor so far then what happened next was unbelievable. She catches a train and finds herself in the Cotswolds. She doesn't book herself into a hotel despite the fact that she has her credit card with her. She knocks on the door of a house and ends up accepting the job of housekeeper after lying like a trouper in the interview.
So far, so according to the chick lit recipe. Take one reasonably attractive young woman (who doesn't realise that she's attractive) and get her into an awkward situation which appears totally insoluble. Produce some help which enables her to cope and stir an attractive man into the mix. Ensure that the baddies all get their comeuppance and bake until you have a happy ending. Even if you just read the précis on the back of the book you probably know exactly how it's going to turn out.
Having said all that, the second half of the book is better than the first. I found the Samantha who realised that she could relax and enjoy herself more believable than the lawyer. I did sense some spark between Samantha and Nathaniel and the portrayal of Samantha's reluctance and indecision about going back to her old life was well done. You could see all of the ending coming a mile away, but it all works out the way that you want it to, so that's no hardship.
The characterisation is, well, extreme. No one ever does anything by halves and sometimes they undergo a complete personality change. An avuncular and friendly man turns out to be a villain. The nouveau-riche employers of the housekeeper turn out to have hearts of gold and feather brains. The gardener has hidden depths and an obliging mother. The lawyers get lawyers a bad name.
What redeems this book is the writing style. It's very easy to read. Kinsella has a good ear for dialogue and moves the story along at a steady pace. If you're looking for an undemanding summer holiday read then you could do a lot worse - Barbara Taylor Bradford's Emma's Secret or indeed any of her later work, springs to mind, but you could do better too. For something with a little more meat and style you could try Julian Fellowes' Snobs, Anthony Capella's The Food of Love or Maggie O'Farrell's After You'd Gone. We also have a review of Finding Audrey by Sophie Kinsella.
Please share on: 
Facebook, 
Twitter and
Instagram
You can read more book reviews or buy The Undomestic Goddess by Sophie Kinsella at Amazon.co.uk Amazon currently charges £2.99 for standard delivery for orders under £20, over which delivery is free.
You can read more book reviews or buy The Undomestic Goddess by Sophie Kinsella at Amazon.com.
Comments
Like to comment on this review?
Just send us an email and we'll put the best up on the site.
Magda said:
Exactly my feelings, Sue!
Wendy said:
I am off on hols on 13th June so may get this to read. It's also nice to have something easy going to read in between heavier books - like Stephen King.
dizilizi said:
To start off with I thought the story was a tad on the silly side. I mean a lawyer getting mistaken for a cleaner then suddenly deciding it was the ideal job for her is rather unlikely. I have read some of Sophie's other books and they were much better, this one wasn't quite up to scratch I'm afraid.
lhine said:
Agreed - this is very undemanding and probably what you'd take on your holidays to read by the pool. Some parts are just beyond belief knocking on strangers doors ,a highly successfull barrister legging it after a mistake and then pretending to be a housekeeper/chef (and getting away with it)etc. etc. But having said that it is chick-lit and should be taken, and enjoyed) as such!
Sophie.emma said:
It is an entertaining easy read and a different theme to Sophie Kinsella's usual shopaholic books. I didn't have any trouble staying interested and reading it from start to finish whilst on holiday, although I do agree that the ending became predictable near the end.
Amanda Borley said:
I enjoyed this book which is a light-hearted read. I am a fan of Sophie Kinsella's previous shopaholic series and was worried that she wouldn't be able to match the readability in this, however I was not disappointed.
Sue replied:
I enjoyed the Shopaholic series, Amanda - I Just didn't feel that this was up to the same standard.
Wendy said:
I have just read Can You Keep a Secret and this was to be my next read of Kinsella. I will give it a go as I need "no brainers" every now and then to balance out the horror of King and Herbert!
