132,956
edits
Changes
Newest Popular Science Reviews (view source)
Revision as of 14:42, 6 January 2013
, 14:42, 6 January 2013no edit summary
==Popular science==
__NOTOC__
{{newreview
|author=Damian O'Brien
|title=If Houses Why Not Mouses?
|rating=3.5
|genre=Popular Science
|summary=I once dedicated an entire linguistics essay to the plural of sheep, in particular my older sister’s youthful fascination with it all. ''One sheep, two sheep. No two sheeps. That silly'' etc etc. So when this book arrived I thought it perfectly plausible that the author had written an extended investigation into house/houses, mouse/mice. (No two mouses? That silly.) What I discovered on making my way through the pages, however, is that there is a lot more to this book that irregular plurals of the 3-year-old-befuddling kind.
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1909395595</amazonuk>
}}
{{newreview
|author=Daniel J Barrett